ZoNotes: HOYAS WIN! HOYAS WIN! HOYAS WIN! HOYAS WIN!
HOYA METER: No More Drama! No More Drama!
There Goes Old Georgetown! Straight for a Rebound! See how they gain ground!! Lie Down Forever Lie Down! Lie Down Forever Lie Down! RAH RAH RAH Hurrah for GEORGETOWN, cheer for victory today!
Freshman point guard Drew Hall is the wooly-haired zen ninja master of the hardcourt, ably dribbling past Providence's John Linehan to feed center Wesley Wilson for an epic dunk with 3 seconds left that secured the Hoyas' 68-67 win over the Friars. Georgetown overcame 27 turnovers and ghastly free-throw shooting to clinch a Quarterfinals matchup with the Miami Hurricanes at 2:30 today. The Hoya Nation saw a dramatic game, a fall from ahead/come from behind thriller that echoed the Hoya teams of the 1980s. You know, the ones with stifling defense and rebounding but no offense? The Hurricanes start the largest lineup in the Big East, but the Hoyas have seen the fires. And practiced their free throws.
Prediction:
HOYAS: 71
CANES: 70
The Battle of Gardez
The U.S. decision to change tactics at Gardez after the escape of al-Qaeda and Taliban forces at Tora Bora in December triggered the use of American regular ground troops. The introduction of conventional forces in a frontal attack on the enemy positions is allegedly generating some heat because of the casualties sustained during the opening phase of the attack. A particularly disgusting situation occurred when a Navy SEAL was executed when he fell off a Chinook helicopter by al Qaeda forces. And to think we got so much flack for the DOWs at Guantanamo.
The battle continues, as American and coalition forces begin to exert their sheer leverage on the remaining pockets of resistance. Is this a replay of the Black Hawk Down disaster in Mogadishu back in 1993? In a way, yes, you can see that dynamic play out during the initial al Qaeda ambush on Saturday. I think though that you could also see a Khafji-like situation developing, too. The force structures and players involved are different, but the coalition use of airpower figures prominently in Gardez 2002 as it did in Khafji 1991.
To Inspect, Or Not To Inspect?
To play with a cliché that is popular these days, where is the daylight? More specifically, where do Iraq hawks and doves part ways in regards as to what to do with Saddam Hussein? In a general sense, doves seem intent mainly on using the threat of force as a wedge to drive open the shady Iraqi weapons of mass destruction (WMD) program to United Nations (UN) inspectors. They are more intent on depriving Hussein of the capability to launch another Gulf War than they are by removing him entirely -- the rationale being that if we were to go into Iraq to "finish the job," we would lose the support of our nominally moderate Arab partners.
On the other hand, hawks generally speaking want to remove Saddam from Iraq and destroy his arsenal. Their thinking is that the Arab states will line up behind a winner and that the European allies are too docile to support the necessary action. They support a DESERT STORM 2.0 of sorts, coupled with help from the disparate Iraqi opposition movements in a replay of the help our Special Forces operators gave to the Afghan opposition to the Taliban.
The current Administration may want to be careful here, because the UN wants inspections more than it wants to remove Hussein entirely. In fact, American national security is hurt more by an Iraqi decision to allow inspections than it is if he defies the UN. Why? Saddam could conceal and disperse his program, burrowing away nuclear/bio/chemical weapons when the inspectors show up. That is why some are pushing for an outright invasion of Iraq, one that will smash the Republican Guard and remove Saddam from power.
Wordplay
"A win by 1 is the same value as a win by 50"
HOYA METER: No More Drama! No More Drama!
There Goes Old Georgetown! Straight for a Rebound! See how they gain ground!! Lie Down Forever Lie Down! Lie Down Forever Lie Down! RAH RAH RAH Hurrah for GEORGETOWN, cheer for victory today!
Freshman point guard Drew Hall is the wooly-haired zen ninja master of the hardcourt, ably dribbling past Providence's John Linehan to feed center Wesley Wilson for an epic dunk with 3 seconds left that secured the Hoyas' 68-67 win over the Friars. Georgetown overcame 27 turnovers and ghastly free-throw shooting to clinch a Quarterfinals matchup with the Miami Hurricanes at 2:30 today. The Hoya Nation saw a dramatic game, a fall from ahead/come from behind thriller that echoed the Hoya teams of the 1980s. You know, the ones with stifling defense and rebounding but no offense? The Hurricanes start the largest lineup in the Big East, but the Hoyas have seen the fires. And practiced their free throws.
Prediction:
HOYAS: 71
CANES: 70
The Battle of Gardez
The U.S. decision to change tactics at Gardez after the escape of al-Qaeda and Taliban forces at Tora Bora in December triggered the use of American regular ground troops. The introduction of conventional forces in a frontal attack on the enemy positions is allegedly generating some heat because of the casualties sustained during the opening phase of the attack. A particularly disgusting situation occurred when a Navy SEAL was executed when he fell off a Chinook helicopter by al Qaeda forces. And to think we got so much flack for the DOWs at Guantanamo.
The battle continues, as American and coalition forces begin to exert their sheer leverage on the remaining pockets of resistance. Is this a replay of the Black Hawk Down disaster in Mogadishu back in 1993? In a way, yes, you can see that dynamic play out during the initial al Qaeda ambush on Saturday. I think though that you could also see a Khafji-like situation developing, too. The force structures and players involved are different, but the coalition use of airpower figures prominently in Gardez 2002 as it did in Khafji 1991.
To Inspect, Or Not To Inspect?
To play with a cliché that is popular these days, where is the daylight? More specifically, where do Iraq hawks and doves part ways in regards as to what to do with Saddam Hussein? In a general sense, doves seem intent mainly on using the threat of force as a wedge to drive open the shady Iraqi weapons of mass destruction (WMD) program to United Nations (UN) inspectors. They are more intent on depriving Hussein of the capability to launch another Gulf War than they are by removing him entirely -- the rationale being that if we were to go into Iraq to "finish the job," we would lose the support of our nominally moderate Arab partners.
On the other hand, hawks generally speaking want to remove Saddam from Iraq and destroy his arsenal. Their thinking is that the Arab states will line up behind a winner and that the European allies are too docile to support the necessary action. They support a DESERT STORM 2.0 of sorts, coupled with help from the disparate Iraqi opposition movements in a replay of the help our Special Forces operators gave to the Afghan opposition to the Taliban.
The current Administration may want to be careful here, because the UN wants inspections more than it wants to remove Hussein entirely. In fact, American national security is hurt more by an Iraqi decision to allow inspections than it is if he defies the UN. Why? Saddam could conceal and disperse his program, burrowing away nuclear/bio/chemical weapons when the inspectors show up. That is why some are pushing for an outright invasion of Iraq, one that will smash the Republican Guard and remove Saddam from power.
Wordplay
"A win by 1 is the same value as a win by 50"